Bloomberg Businessweek
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-08-25/nlrb-jimmy-johns-cant-fire-workers-for-icky-sick-leave-protest
NLRB: Jimmy John's Can't Fire Workers for Icky Sick-Leave Protest
By Josh Eidelson
August 25, 2014
The government is ordering a Jimmy Johnfs franchisee to rehire workers who
were fired after putting up posters suggesting that the people making customersf
sandwiches could be ill.
In a decision dated Thursday, Aug 21, the National Labor Relations Board
found that a Minnesota Jimmy Johnfs violated the National Labor Relations Act
when it fired half a dozen workers active in a union campaign by the Industrial
Workers of the World. According to the NLRB, pro-union workers, to protest their
lack of paid sick days, had put up posters on community bulletin boards in the
stores and in public places in the vicinity.
The workers gclearly intend to harm [the company] and the security of the 240
local jobs we provide,h said
Mike Mulligan, the president of the franchisee, MikLin Enterprises. Although
U.S. labor law generally bans retaliation against workers for taking collective
action to improve their working conditions, the NLRB has ruled that companies
can punish workers whose communications to the public are gso disloyal, reckless
or maliciously untrue as to lose the [National Labor Relations] Actfs
protection.h So management argued it had the right to can the Jimmy Johnfs
activists.
The NLRB disagreed. The Labor Board wrote that the postersf claim that they
lacked paid sick days gwas factually accurate,h that there was no evidence the
workers gacted recklessly,h and that by asking customers to call their boss and
tell him they should have sick days, they gdemonstrated that they were motivated
by a sincere desire to improve their terms and conditions of employment.h
Along with firing the workers, the NLRB found that the franchisee also broke
the law in other ways, including by supervisors when they were gencouraging
employees to disparage an employee union supporter on Facebook.h Jimmy Johnfs
did not immediately respond to a request for comment.